Just found out about your ISA compression on usenet. Good compression and fast encoding does indeed sound interesting... :)
Are you still working on it?
Unlike some other people who have voiced their opinion (on usenet), I wouldn't mind switching to another lossless format if it provides 10% better compression (assuming I can load/save from common viewers/editors).
I tried some other encoders on that kodim01.bmp, here are some results including 3 earlier ones for reference:
- Code: Select all
KODIM01.PNG 736,501
kodim01_pngout.png 694,811 PNGOUT
KODIM01.ISA 548,591
KODIM01.JP2 510,320
kodim01.jls 508,753 HP's JPEG-LS
kodim01_rkim_c.rki 489,205 rkim 1.05 c
kodim01_rkim_cx.rki 477,186 rkim 1.05 cx
kodim01_uhic_e.uhi 471,410 uhic 2.0 e
kodim01_uhic_m.uhi 467,110 uhic 2.0 m
Surprisingly JPEG-LS didn't do too well, maybe because the image is small. I tried it on quite a few images (large and larger), and it's always noticeably better than JPEG2000 (wasn't JP2K supposed to be based on JPEG-LS? How did that happen?!), and much faster than any JP2K encoder I know.
UHIC, and certainly RKIM, are rather slow.
Ehud.
